Weblog
Tuesday, 02 June 2009
-

Currently
Pirates Of The Caribbean: At World's End
see relatedAn Ounce of Introspection
Observe the following recent events:- Miss California 2009 loses what would have been her crown because she "[believes] that marriage should be between a man and a woman". Not only does she lose the crown, she also becomes the scorn of society.
- Grad student Julia Ward was expelled from Eastern Michigan University's graduate counseling program because she would not affirm that homosexual behavior was acceptable. (Instead, she had referred the client to another counselor who "did not have a conscience issue with the very matter to be discussed", as advised by her professor.)
"Church fined (or worse) because they discriminate against persons of other sexual orientations as candidates for church leadership"Okay, I'm sure there are laws to prevent such situations from happening these days, so maybe this is too much of an extreme. (Though, I can think of examples where legal America is affected by cultural America. But anyway.)
I have the following issue. Of course, I care about my homosexual neighbors just as I do my straight neighbors. Most Christian discussions that I've had address the question by talking about how we should love everyone. Sure, focusing on Christ's love places things in perspective, so by all means that's what we should do.
But wait just a second: if forced to answer the question "Is homosexuality a sin?", what would you say? (Picture the classic "Just answer the question! Yes or no?") The Bible says "yes" (Rom. 1:26,27 among others), and my personal beliefs align with this . But everything about American society tells us that we would be narrow-minded, not politically correct, un-loving and downright wrong to say anything but "no".
The result? In Christian settings, I have no problem answering the question (chiming in with the choir, so to speak), but if asked point-blank by my vocal, athiest, politically-correct friends, I might side-step the question and blather something about love. I'm not saying that talk of love is wrong -- it's totally not. But I'd probably resort to talk of love only to mask the fact that I don't want to answer the question. This reeks of insincerity, and I hate it.
Right now, it's an internal struggle, but sometimes I wonder what's keeping it from becoming more of a societal "problem" (à la "Christians harbor criminal, discriminating views"). What if the day comes when the government (or whoever) says you have to choose sides? This goes beyond the issue of homosexuality and at the core is about being scared to stand with the Truth when the Truth and society's moral standard are in direct conflict with each other*. Is the fear great enough to compromise my beliefs? If yes, then my love for others is but a façade hiding my cowardice, and not love at all.
*For those who don't think homosexuality falls into this class of issues, that's a discussion for another day. Pick your favorite issue on which society and the Bible say different things. Without loss of generality, I think we can all agree that such issues exist.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wish we had cable TV. Then I could watch the playoffs. And the French Open. Instead, I'm forced to be productive and write self-examining entries like this. ugh.
Friday, 11 July 2008
-
"KISS: Keep it simple, stupid." - Math proverb
What has happened to Xanga since my extended respite? It took me 5 minutes to figure out how to make a new entry, and now I've done forgot what I was going to say. So instead, Xanga, please work on this user interface. It's simply horrid. A prime example of how an over-enthusiasm to provide me with functionality is crimping xanga's functionality. What are all these buttons? What are all these menus? Side menus, bar menus, secondary bar menus, .... what's that? No diagonal animated menu? I have a headache.
Sunday, 28 October 2007
-

Currently Listening
Beauty And The Beast: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack
see relatedSo in AI, one of the philosophical questions is how to tell if a machine has achieved "Artificial Intelligence." Can intelligence be observed solely from a behavioral perspective? i.e. if a machine is programmed to act intelligently, is it necessarily intelligent? On the other side of the spectrum, what do we do with a machine that is claimed "intelligent" but can't do anything? Perhaps a balance between the two schools of thought? And why are we trying to create something equivalent to (if not better than) the human again? Who exactly do we think we are? hmm....
Anyway, point of the following comic IS: Alan Turing proposed the Turing Test: a human interrogator asks the machine questions (through a wall, screen, whatever), and if the interrogator cannot tell by the response if it is a machine or human behind the wall, then it is intelligent (enough)!
I have been updating a lot more than usual. Guess that only means one thing.
Sunday, 14 October 2007
Thursday, 07 December 2006
-
The Epitome of a Nerd
--edited--
Today a friend called me the `epitome of nerdiness'. Wow, epitome is a strong word. Let's think on this one for a moment. For one, I like to think that I have some social skills. (Others may beg to differ, as long as I don't hear about it!) I'm also not a guy. I'm also not a Best Buy clerk who adores Linux, hates Windows with a passion, mutters -- to himself and others -- in a different language (e.g. C++), and plays video games at every waking moment (*ahem* Michelle haha). So, epitome, eh? I think I have just redefined what it means to be a `nerd'.
In all seriousness, I like to think that's a good thing. Computer science communities across the board are scrambling (and reasonably so) to get more girls interested in the field. It seems that one of the major reasons that girls don't go into computer science is because of stereotypes (like the ones aforementioned). Studies have shown that people generally associate computer science with `nerds' who have no social skills and no life outside of computers. Such an injustice to computer science. Why don't we associate biology or criminology with these stereotypes? Whatever the stereotypes/trends may be, they don't define what computer science IS and it's sad that they do so much to turn people away from CS. Tremendous efforts have gone to exposing girls to computer science early -- BEFORE they even begin to associate the subject with `nerds'.
So though you think I'm nerdy (and of course, I am to some degree), I am unfortunately not the epitome of the `nerd' as society defines it. If I were, gender ratios wouldn't be as much of a problem and the computer science community could focus more on computer science, and less on the fact that the gender ratios in computer science are so out of whack. My ACM subscriptions would have more about algorithms than "how to get women interested".
Anyway, that phrase has a lot more implications than people may realize.
<edit #2>
Rest assured that I don't take offense when my friends point out my "nerdiness" - I never have. Actually, for some strange reason, I take such comments as compliments... For most of you, your definition of `nerd' is not a negative thing (I hope). But society doesn't agree with you and these stereotypes are having a direct impact on a targeted field of study! SO SAD. Fine, no one cares... well YOU SHOULD.
</edit #2>
-------------------------
On a different note, sometimes you can't do the right thing without taking a step of faith.
"Electrons smoke a lot of pot." -professor
Monday, 13 February 2006
-
So this past week, I needed several girls to be in a certain place at a certain time for a surprise event, and pestering them about coming wasn't working -- some were still only "trying to make it". To ensure that they would be there, I sent the following email:
Hi guys,
So.... the reason I keep asking all of you if you're coming to sg tomorrow is that I have something really exciting (and kind of serious) to share. It's complicated, so I don't want to tell you all individually -- besides, this is kind of something that you share with your sg (+Steph) all at once. So please come! I have some really really interesting news that I think you all want to hear.Okay, see you all tomorrow! =D
Love,
JessNote: there was no "interesting serious news" . I made it all up to get them to come out.
Thanks to Gmail Notifier, I didn't have the chance to escape to the shower:
Person A: "JESS!! DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO TELL ME?" ...
Person A: "It's about ________, isn't it?"
Person B: "No, it's about ________"
Person B: "No, wait, you're pregnant!" (yes, I'm so serious -- verbatim)
...
Person B: "Oh I know - it's definitely about ________. I don't even have to come to small group to know." (not the reaction I was aiming for)
Person B: "Well if it isn't ________, then he wouldn't mind if we called him about it...?" (that's right, girls do harness the power of manipulation from time to time -- but only when it's really important.)And on invading my computer for clues:
Person B: "Oh, we should have! Darn, why didn't we think of that?"
Person A: "I would never do that to you, Jessica."
Person B: "I would."Look at the excitement in this email:
I think its about a boy!!!!
hehehehee.....jk jk jk
dont kill me jess ^_^Thank you, stephieng, the only one who thought my mysterious news was about something like missions. It's amazing the kind of conclusions we will jump to at the slightest hint of "interesting news". My credibility is completely shot concerning my small group. I (and several others) thought the ends would justify the means, but to those I stumbled, please accept my deepest apologies and some Lindt chocolate. I don't normally tell real lies. And thank you fellas, for the affirmation. We were very much surprised.
-
- Name: Jess
- Country: United States
- State: Kentucky
- Metro: Lexington
- Gender: Female
- Member Since: 12/23/2005







